V a How Long Does It Take Appeal Ramp Denieal to Hiher Level Review?

In the summertime of 2017, President Trump signed into law the Appeals Modernization Act establishing a new process for the Department of Veterans Diplomacy in the way they handle benefit processing for VA disability claims and VA decisions. The Act is designed to improve timeliness, provide more transparency, and be fairer in an endeavour to meliorate benefits for veterans. The Act went into effect in early 2019.

VA RAMP, the Rapid Appeals Modernization Act, was an invitation for veterans to enter into the program earlier than the February 2019 date and gives 2 options for veterans to participate, either the Supplemental Claim or a Higher-Level Review Claim. From April 1, 2018, all veterans who had a claim on appeal were eligible to participate in RAMP. Yet, the question is, how benign has it been to veterans?

VA Supplemental Claim Lane

The Supplemental Merits Lane is i pick, bachelor from different lanes, designed specifically to allow veterans to submit new evidence to support their merits. The VA is under obligation to provide "Duty to Assistance" past police force with these appeals. In club to exist eligible, a veteran must have an active appeal for a disability claim at one of the following levels:

1. Accept filed a Observe of Disagreement (NOD);
2. Have filed a VA Form nine (Entreatment to the Board of Veteran's Appeals – BVA)
3. Have been certified to the BVA (Board of Veterans Appeals); or
4. Take a remand from the BVA.

Veterans were able to "opt-in" by sending in a signed opt-in form which allows them to transfer their claim to the RAMP plan and submit new and relevant bear witness in support of the claim. The longer it takes for the new show to be submitted, the longer it will have for a VA ratings decision to exist made. The VA is stating they expect to complete supplemental claims inside 125 days.

New and Relevant Prove

1 of the large questions is what exactly "new and relevant" show is. The terminology is different than what the VA required previously; new and material evidence, and no ruling has yet to exist made on what makes "material" different from "relevant."

Fabric prove was divers previously as "relevant and related to an unestablished fact necessary to prove the merits. It must have a legitimate influence or bearing on the decision, and cannot exist cumulative or redundant." In the legal world, material evidence is offered to prove an issue is true.

Relevant evidence seems like it should be the aforementioned as material. However, in the legal world, relevant evidence must be textile or accept probative value, which means it must testify the result is more or less probable truthful, information technology does not necessarily accept to evidence anything. This seems like a bottom degree of weight required for additional bear witness, only again, there is no official ruling past the VA as of yet. This is actually more in line with the VA's policy of siding towards the veteran, merely is notwithstanding something nosotros will be watching closely as decisions are rendered.

Once a merits has been denied due to evidence not being new and relevant, an entreatment will come forth to request a definition from the VA. However, we are still waiting on definitions for and clarification on and so many other legal terms used past the VA, it may be years before a clearer understanding of the difference in required prove is made.

One of the most important things to remember is to get together all your show PRIOR to opting into the RAMP Supplemental Claim Lane. The VA still has to develop evidence at their stop, and waiting to submit evidence later you have opted in will simply ho-hum things down.

What Can Be Submitted equally New and Relevant Evidence?

First, the evidence must be new, something the VA has not seen before that is not redundant or a repeat of records already reviewed. For example, new records from treatment provider showing the same diagnosis will not be considered new, but records showing an increased level of severity or a new diagnosis concerning the same consequence will exist considered new. An independent medical evaluation is considered new evidence. Relevant means, for the sake of this article, that it has to do with the issue(due south) on appeal. Filing show of a psychiatric diagnosis is non relevant to a dorsum condition, unless there is a diagnosis of pain syndrome that is causing the mental health condition. In other words, the evidence submitted must be linked to the condition on appeal, even if it is a secondary status due to the original issue claimed.

Show can come in many forms:

1. Lay evidence: a argument from a non-professional person that attests to the veteran's behaviors or physical conditions that has not been previously submitted and the VA has no previous knowledge of. For example, on a PTSD claim, submitting a statement from a parent stating how the veteran'due south behaviors accept changed from prior to service compared to after service.
2. Medical treatment records: from a treatment provider, individual or the VA, that includes new information such as a new diagnosis, an increased level of severity, or a secondary diagnosis related to the issue on appeal.
3. Independent medical opinion: an opinion from an objective provider who has nothing to gain from or investment in either the veteran or the VA. The provider is presented with documented bear witness of the claim, the same show the VA has reviewed, and provides their unbiased opinion of the facts.
4. Service Records/Service Medical Records: Any service records the VA has not already reviewed that have new evidence of the effect such every bit handling records showing the veteran received treatment for the status in service where no records had been reviewed prior or of an upshot that is related to the condition. This can also include the service records of other service members who served with the veteran. For example, if a veteran is appealing a denial of PTSD and another service member in their unit received a purple middle for being injured while they were stationed together due to an IED, that would be new and relevant evidence.

As with any new program, there are ever bugs to work out. The VA's claims of decisions in 52 days are non coming to light as of still for near veterans, and many are non meeting the 125 solar day deadlines either. Ask your representative or attorney to review everything earlier yous submit information technology because as the laws are written to make things faster and simpler, they seem to ever brand them more complicated when it comes to new systems.

Cassandra Crosby, Claims Abet

Cassandra Crosby is a Veteran's Claims Advocate for Colina & Ponton. She has over twenty years of experience of management of non-profits programs in Mental Wellness, Substance Abuse, and Victim Services. She started at Hill & Ponton in the Spring of 2016. She is currently focusing on reviewing files for evidence that can be beneficial to disability claims. She is a Florida native and is as well a full fourth dimension pupil working on a Bachelor's Degree in Legal Studies.

martinezpolday.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.hillandponton.com/ramp-supplemental-claim-lane/

Share this post